Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, KONDO Mitsumasa <kondo(dot)mitsumasa(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses
Date: 2013-07-17 10:54:31
Message-ID: 51E677E7.6070803@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/16/13 11:36 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> As you know running a full suite of write benchmarks takes a very long
> time, with results often being inconclusive (noise is greater than
> effect we are trying to measure).

I didn't say that. What I said is that over a full suite of write
benchmarks, the effect of changes like this has always averaged out to
zero. You should try it sometime. Then we can have a useful discussion
of non-trivial results instead of you continuing to tell me I don't
understand things.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-07-17 11:54:57 Re: Improvement of checkpoint IO scheduler for stable transaction responses
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-07-17 10:16:00 Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited