| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gavin Flower <gavinflower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |
| Date: | 2013-07-12 00:47:58 |
| Message-ID: | 51DF523E.8050006@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On 07/10/2013 10:09 PM, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2013-07-10 09:47:34 -0700, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com wrote:
>>
>> Due to the apparent lack of performance testing, I'm setting this back
>> to "needs review".
>
> The original submission (i.e. the message linked from the CF page)
> includes test results that showed a clear performance improvement.
> Here's an excerpt:
I didn't see that, and nobody replied to my email.
So, where are we with this patch, then?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chad Wagner | 2013-07-12 01:14:38 | Re: Preventing tuple-table leakage in plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Chad Wagner | 2013-07-12 00:46:57 | Re: Preventing tuple-table leakage in plpgsql |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2013-07-12 06:18:36 | Re: [PERFORM] In progress INSERT wrecks plans on table |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-12 00:46:18 | Re: Trying to eliminate union and sort |