|From:||Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>|
|To:||Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>|
|Cc:||cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 07/10/2013 09:04 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 07/04/2013 06:11 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
>> Le mercredi 3 juillet 2013 23:56:42, Josh Berkus a écrit :
>>> Peter, Cedric, etc.:
>>> Where are we on this patch? Seems like discussion died out. Should it
>>> be bounced?
>> I for myself have been presuaded that it is a good idea. Things apparently loosed are not, it just outline that we need better coverage in PGXS area, so it is another thing to consider (TODO : add resgress test for PGXS ...)
> To be more focused: is this patch going to be committed in the next 4
> days or not? If not, it's time to mark it "returned" so we can have
> leisurely spec argument later.
I think that would probably be the better course. I'm not sure there is
a consensus about this.
|Next Message||Kevin Grittner||2013-07-11 03:43:52||Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree|
|Previous Message||Fabrízio de Royes Mello||2013-07-11 03:04:09||Re: Add regression tests for DISCARD|