Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib
Date: 2013-07-11 01:04:46
Message-ID: 51DE04AE.1080703@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/04/2013 06:11 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> Le mercredi 3 juillet 2013 23:56:42, Josh Berkus a écrit :
>> Peter, Cedric, etc.:
>>
>> Where are we on this patch? Seems like discussion died out. Should it
>> be bounced?
>
> I for myself have been presuaded that it is a good idea. Things apparently loosed are not, it just outline that we need better coverage in PGXS area, so it is another thing to consider (TODO : add resgress test for PGXS ...)
>

To be more focused: is this patch going to be committed in the next 4
days or not? If not, it's time to mark it "returned" so we can have
leisurely spec argument later.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-07-11 01:08:09 Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-07-11 01:02:00 Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists