From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Remove useless USE_PGXS support in contrib |
Date: | 2013-07-11 01:04:46 |
Message-ID: | 51DE04AE.1080703@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/04/2013 06:11 AM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> Le mercredi 3 juillet 2013 23:56:42, Josh Berkus a écrit :
>> Peter, Cedric, etc.:
>>
>> Where are we on this patch? Seems like discussion died out. Should it
>> be bounced?
>
> I for myself have been presuaded that it is a good idea. Things apparently loosed are not, it just outline that we need better coverage in PGXS area, so it is another thing to consider (TODO : add resgress test for PGXS ...)
>
To be more focused: is this patch going to be committed in the next 4
days or not? If not, it's time to mark it "returned" so we can have
leisurely spec argument later.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-11 01:08:09 | Re: [PATCH] Add transforms feature |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-07-11 01:02:00 | Re: review: Non-recursive processing of AND/OR lists |