Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: changeset generation v5-01 - Patches & git tree
Date: 2013-06-28 14:26:14
Message-ID: 51CD9D06.6060804@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/28/13 8:46 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I personally favor making catalog modifications a bit more more
> expensive instead of increasing the WAL volume during routine
> operations. I don't think index maintenance itself comes close to the
> biggest cost for DDL we have atm.

That makes sense to me in principle.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-06-28 14:31:16 Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division
Previous Message David Fetter 2013-06-28 14:25:14 Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division