Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
Date: 2013-06-27 20:13:29
Message-ID: 51CC9CE9.1000209@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 6/26/13 11:29 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The issue with Salesforce is the length of the deal --- 9 years. It is
> hard to call that just "maintain a relationship with Oracle".

There are two major problems with this thinking:

-It assumes there is only one Oracle application inside of Salesforce.
Just at a very high level, in addition to their namesake CRM application
there's also their cloud database at http://database.com/ and that
announcement was filled with cloudy stuff.

-A gigantic database installation can easily take 9 years to migrate to
a new platform, before every instance is converted.

The Salesforce/Oracle announcement reeks of co-marketing announcement.
It isn't necessarily connected to their infrastructure plans at all.
The real about-face going on there is Oracle's changed stance on the
whole "cloud database" concept. That topic is a much more interesting
one for this advocacy list to me.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Paul Argudo 2013-06-28 09:16:25 Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-06-27 15:12:46 Re: SMH on Salesforce-Oracle