Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List
Date: 2013-06-24 18:13:43
Message-ID: 51C88C57.2070109@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/24/2013 10:59 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
> On 2013-06-24 10:50:42 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>>> The problem with that is that that HUGELY depends on the patch and the
>>> review. There are patches where reviewers do a good percentage of the
>>> work and others where they mostly tell that "compiles & runs".
>>
>> This project is enormously stingy with giving credit to people. It's
>> not like it costs us money, you know.
>
> Listing a reviewer that didn't do all that much at the same level as the
> author or an somebody having done an extensive review will cost you
> contributors in the long run.
>
> I am all for introducing a "Contributed by reviewing: ..." section in
> the release notes.

It should be listed with the specific feature.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-06-24 18:17:31 Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-06-24 18:01:01 Re: XLogInsert scaling, revisited