Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space
Date: 2013-06-15 09:31:42
Message-ID: 51BC347E.1030600@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/15/2013 03:53 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> Yeah this one is not making the grade. pg_hba is just that host based
> auth but I think we are bikeshedding now.

Agreed... Even as I posted, I realised I shouldn't have mentioned the
last point, since everything else has been ignored.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2013-06-15 09:57:26 Re: Hard to Use WAS: Hard limit on WAL space
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2013-06-15 09:22:21 Re: MD5 aggregate