| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)vt(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u |
| Date: | 2013-05-29 13:44:00 |
| Message-ID: | 51A60620.2010505@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 5/28/13 10:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u.
> Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4? I can keep supporting -u
> as an undocumented option.
It seems to me that that option shouldn't be necessary anyway.
pg_upgrade should somehow be able to find out by itself what the
superuser of the old cluster was.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas | 2013-05-29 13:58:09 | foreign key to multiple tables depending on another column's value |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-05-29 13:42:12 | Re: pg_upgrade -u |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-05-29 13:45:21 | Re: GRANT role_name TO role_name ON database_name |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-05-29 13:42:12 | Re: pg_upgrade -u |