Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Date: 2013-05-29 00:32:27
Message-ID: 51A54C9B.2050008@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/29/2013 05:11 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Sure, it is on the TODO list:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#.2Fcontrib.2Fpg_upgrade
>
> I can only get a link to pg_upgrade from there, so look two sections
> below that for "Wire Protocol Changes".
Thanks.

The direct link is
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Wire_Protocol_Changes for anyone
looking for it later.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2013-05-29 00:49:55 Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-05-29 00:12:23 Re: Logging of PAM Authentication Failure