Re: Strange behavior of "=" as assignment operator

On 05/28/2013 01:06 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Moshe Jacobson (moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com) wrote:
>> It seems that the comparison operator "=" is functioning as the assignment
>> operator ":=" in this plpgsql trigger script I wrote. I was under the
>> impression that "=" is only for comparison and not assignment. If this is
>> true, please explain the transcript below. If it's not true, where is this
>> documented? I'm using PostgreSQL 9.1.4.
> Both are supported. It's not really documented as using '=' is
> considered 'legacy' but it's also extensively used and removing it would
> break quite a bit of code for people.
>
>

You mean legacy code as provided in the documentation examples?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/plpgsql-trigger.html (see
examples 39-5 and 39-6).

Fixing the example code is probably a low-hanging-fruit place to start.
I don't have time right now or I'd submit a patch.

Cheers,
Steve