Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com" <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication
Date: 2013-05-23 02:51:45
Message-ID: 519D8441.7040701@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On 05/22/2013 07:17 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:

> > According the the data sheet it is power safe.
> >
> > http://investors.micron.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=732650
> > http://www.micron.com/products/solid-state-storage/client-ssd/m500-ssd
>
> Wow, that seems like a pretty good deal then assuming it works and
> performs decently.

Yeah that was my thinking. Sure it isn't an S3700 but for the money it
is still faster than the comparable spindle configuration.

JD

>
> merlin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-05-23 06:13:44 Re: Very slow inner join query Unacceptable latency.
Previous Message Mark Kirkwood 2013-05-23 02:44:18 Re: Reliability with RAID 10 SSD and Streaming Replication