Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report

On 05/05/2013 05:16 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
> <mailto:bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 03:03:58PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
> > Some suggestions, perhaps just based on my preference for verbosity:
> >
> >
> > <para>
> > Add cache of local locks (Jeff Janes)
> > </para>
> >
> > <para>
> > This speeds lock release at statement completion in
> transactions
> > that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for pg_dump.
> > </para>
> >
> >
> > I think this is equally important for restoration of dumps, if
> the restoration
> > is run all in one transaction. (Making the dump and restoring
> it have similar
> > locking and unlocking patterns)
>
> Do you have proposed wording? I can't say just dump/restore as it
> only
> helps with _logical_ dump and _logical_ restore, and we don't have a
> clear word for logical restore, as it could be pg_restore or piped
> into
> psql. We could do:
>
> that hold many locks; it is particularly useful for
> pg_dump and restore.
>
> but "restore" seems very vague.
>
>
>
> Yeah, I wasn't sure about how to work that either.
>
> "...and the restore of such dumps."?
>

s/restore/restoration/

cheers

andrew