Re: Reformatting the FDW wiki page

From: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>,damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Reformatting the FDW wiki page
Date: 2015-02-16 04:10:24
Message-ID: 51850993-A533-4B68-B5C6-D2E3AF49BFAB@gunduz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

A new version was released last week.

On February 15, 2015 11:23:05 PM EET, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>
>wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 15/02/2015 22:18, Dave Page a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 4:06 PM, damien clochard
><damien(at)dalibo(dot)info> wrote:
>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>
>>>> Last time I checked, there's now more that 40 Foreign Data Wrappers
>in
>>>> the wild and the wiki that tries to keep track of everything is
>kind of
>>>> a mess :
>>>>
>>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * The page is way too long to scroll
>>>> * Separating the "native" FDW from the "multicorn" FDW doesn't
>really
>>>> make sense for the end user.
>>>> * For some data source, they are several FDW living their own lives
>>>> (mongo for instance)
>>>> * For each FDW the data provided can easily be standardized ( data
>>>> source, url, PGXN link, comment, etc.) so that each project can be
>>>> treated in the same way
>>>> * We need to find a unified format to update and maintain this data
>easily
>>>>
>>>> So I'd like to start a complete makeover of this page, but before I
>go
>>>> bonkers on the wiki syntax, here's a preview :
>>>>
>>>> Here's the NoSQL section as it is now :
>>>>
>https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Foreign_data_wrappers#NoSQL_Database_Wrappers
>>>>
>>>> Here's the NoSQL section as I'd like it to be :
>>>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/FDW_v2
>>>>
>>>> Any comments ?
>>>
>>> I think that's much better - thanks.
>>>
>>> Just to note though - EDB took over maintenance of the Mongo FDW
>from
>>> Citus Data, with their approval. You should probably only list that
>>> one once.
>>>
>>
>> good to know, I'll update the page.
>>
>> Does this means that EDB is maintaining the PGXN package as well ?
>
>Yes, I believe that's all been sorted out with David now. I don't know
>if a new release has been pushed yet though.
>
>--
>Dave Page
>Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>Twitter: @pgsnake
>
>EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-advocacy mailing list (pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-advocacy

--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2015-02-16 12:54:07 Re: GSoC 2015 - mentors, students and admins.
Previous Message Dave Page 2015-02-15 21:23:05 Re: Reformatting the FDW wiki page