| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Analyzing bug 8049 |
| Date: | 2013-04-29 20:24:17 |
| Message-ID: | 517ED6F1.7010302@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/28/13 7:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thoughts? Anybody know of a counterexample to the idea that no plug-ins
> call query_planner()?
I would assume that anyone writing anything that calls such a low-level function reads -hackers regularly and would easily be able to handle whatever changes to their code that the new callback parameter required. We would obviously want to send notice about this ahead-of-time in addition to sticking something in the release notes.
That said, I'd be rather surprised if anything actually calls planner functions directly.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-04-29 20:26:27 | Re: Remaining beta blockers |
| Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2013-04-29 20:18:12 | Re: Graph datatype addition |