Re: keeping WAL after dropping replication slots

From: Chris Mair <chris(at)1006(dot)org>
To: Tom DalPozzo <t(dot)dalpozzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: keeping WAL after dropping replication slots
Date: 2017-04-07 06:26:59
Message-ID: 515844c9f76d0c93b6b065c48263c47f@smtp.hushmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Postgres version?
>
> 9.6.1

Have you considered upgrading to 9.6.2?
There were some fixes, including WAL related:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/release-9-6-2.html

Not exactly regarding what you see, though...

Bye,
Chris.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Günce Kaya 2017-04-07 07:11:54 Re: calculating table and index size
Previous Message Tom DalPozzo 2017-04-07 06:18:54 Re: keeping WAL after dropping replication slots