Re: patch to add \watch to psql

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Will Leinweber <will(at)heroku(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: patch to add \watch to psql
Date: 2013-03-26 21:14:22
Message-ID: 51520FAE.3000209@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/24/13 3:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I also concur with the complaint here
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAZKuFZxyj-RT1aeC6s0g7zM68tDLfbBM1R6HGrbbxnz80KcoA@mail.gmail.com
> that allowing a minimum sleep of 0 is rather dangerous

The original "watch" command apparently silently corrects a delay of 0
to 0.1 seconds.

> Another minor question is whether we really need the time-of-day in the
> banner,

That's also part of the original "watch" and occasionally useful, I think.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-03-26 21:18:42 Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2013-03-26 21:06:35 Re: spoonbill vs. -HEAD