Re: Problem with background worker

From: Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with background worker
Date: 2013-03-20 16:06:42
Message-ID: 5149DE92.7050809@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 20/03/2013 16:33, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Marc Cousin escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to write a background writer, and I'm facing a problem with
>> timestamps. The following code is where I'm having a problem (it's just a demo for
>> the problem):
>>
>> BackgroundWorkerInitializeConnection("test", NULL);
>> while (!got_sigterm)
>> {
>> int ret;
>> /* Wait 1s */
>> ret = WaitLatch(&MyProc->procLatch,
>> WL_LATCH_SET | WL_TIMEOUT | WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH,
>> 1000L);
>> ResetLatch(&MyProc->procLatch);
>> /* Insert dummy for now */
>> StartTransactionCommand();
>> SPI_connect();
>> PushActiveSnapshot(GetTransactionSnapshot());
>> ret = SPI_execute("INSERT INTO log VALUES (now(),statement_timestamp(),clock_timestamp())", false, 0);
>> SPI_finish();
>> PopActiveSnapshot();
>> CommitTransactionCommand();
>> }
>
> Ah. The reason for this problem is that the statement start time (which
> also sets the transaction start time, when it's the first statement) is
> set by postgres.c, not the transaction-control functions in xact.c. So
> you'd need to add a SetCurrentStatementStartTimestamp() call somewhere
> in your loop.
>

Yes, that works. Thanks a lot !

Maybe this should be added to the worker_spi example ?

Regards

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-03-20 16:13:22 Re: Problem with background worker
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-03-20 16:06:38 Re: pg_upgrade segfaults when given an invalid PGSERVICE value