| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tuning for mid-size server |
| Date: | 2003-10-21 18:43:47 |
| Message-ID: | 5140.1066761827@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> I think the "25%" rule of thumb is slightly stale: above some
> threshold, it just falls apart, and lots of people now have machines
> well within that threshold. Heck, I'll bet Bruce's 2-way machine is
> within that threshold.
IIRC, we've not seen much evidence that increasing shared_buffers above
about 10000 delivers any performance boost. That's 80Mb, so the "25%"
rule doesn't get seriously out of whack until you get to a gig or so of
RAM. Which was definitely not common at the time the rule was put
forward, but is now. Probably we should modify the rule-of-thumb to
something like "25%, but not more than 10000 buffers".
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-10-21 18:51:02 | Re: Tuning for mid-size server |
| Previous Message | William Yu | 2003-10-21 18:27:08 | Re: Tuning for mid-size server |