Re: Materialized views WIP patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Materialized views WIP patch
Date: 2013-03-04 00:27:02
Message-ID: 5133EA56.2050103@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers


> There's a much more fundamental reason why this will never happen, which
> is that the query planner is not licensed to decide that you only want
> an approximate and not an exact answer to your query.

I think it would be worth talking about when someone wants to implement
it. I'd imagine it would require setting a GUC, though, which would be
off by default for obvious reasosn.

> If MVs were guaranteed always up-to-date, maybe we could think about
> automatic use of them --- but that's a far different feature from what
> Kevin has here.

And of limited utility, as mentioned.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-03-04 00:32:42 pgsql: Fix map_sql_value_to_xml_value() to treat domains like their bas
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-03-04 00:25:13 pgsql: Add a materialized view relations.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-03-04 00:34:02 Re: is it bug? - printing boolean domains in sql/xml function
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-03-04 00:07:39 Re: CREATE RULE "_RETURN" and toast tables