Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key

From: Julien Cigar <jcigar(at)ulb(dot)ac(dot)be>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
Date: 2013-02-12 13:06:57
Message-ID: 511A3E71.10604@ulb.ac.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

The biggest difference in performance between text and integer keys is
usually down to whether you're inserting in order or not. Inserting in
order is tons faster regardless of the type, since it keeps the index
unfragmented and doesn't cause page splits.

On 02/04/2013 22:52, Anne Rosset wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have read a lot of different information about the benefits of using
> numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key(small size). And
> what I am gathering is that for performance there is no more great
> advantage.
>
> It seems like now RDBMS in general, postgres in particular handles
> pretty well joins on text indexes.
>
> Did I understand correctly?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anne
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Grant Johnson 2013-02-12 15:05:29 Re: numerical primary key vs alphanumerical primary key
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2013-02-12 02:54:57 Re: postgresql.conf recommendations