| From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andreas Kretschmer <andreas(at)a-kretschmer(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?) |
| Date: | 2013-02-08 18:13:34 |
| Message-ID: | 5115404E.7080403@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 02/08/2013 10:09 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I am not sure I am following. Are we talking two different cases here?
>
> What I was pointing out was that the non-superuser case seems to be
> broken almost completely, whereas the superuser case is only broken
> if the object owner has given away some grant options and those have
> been exercised.
Got it, thanks.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-02-08 18:40:43 | Re: Decrease the time required function |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-08 18:09:07 | Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-08 18:21:39 | Re: Time for an autoconf update |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-02-08 18:09:07 | Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to drop privileges granted by non-owners (was Re: [GENERAL] Bug, Feature, or what else?) |