Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC

From: Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Alias hstore's ? to ~ so that it works with JDBC
Date: 2013-02-06 17:20:31
Message-ID: 511290DF.1020502@abshere.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

merlin,

Yes, you're correct, my phrasing was bad: all I meant was that it was a
conflict, not a bug in Postgres or hstore.

I personally don't know of any way around the conflict except changing
JDBC or hstore, and I don't think JDBC is gonna change.

Deciding not to accommodate JDBC on the Postgres side, though, is going
to prevent hstore from being used properly with Java or any JVM-based
language like JRuby.

Please let me know if my assumptions are wrong.

Best,
Seamus

On 2/6/13 10:58 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Seamus Abshere <seamus(at)abshere(dot)net> wrote:
>> As reported in BUG #7715 [1], hstore's use of ? as an operator conflicts
>> with JDBC's bind variables.
>>
>> I think we could just alias ? to ~ and tell JDBC users to use that instead.
>
> This is not a bug with postgres, but with java/JDBC. There are many
> operators that use '?' besides hstore and JDBC should allow for
> escaping out of its statement interpretation.
>
> merlin
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-02-06 17:25:34 Re: sql_drop Event Trigger
Previous Message Phil Sorber 2013-02-06 17:14:01 Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)