Re: obsolete code

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: obsolete code
Date: 2013-02-01 22:16:35
Message-ID: 510C3EC3.1070509@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/1/13 11:06 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> My hope was that if we got rid of the old stuff we wouldn't need to use
>
> PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(myfunc);
>
> in external modules any more

My fear with that would be that people would start forgetting this and
modules won't work with older PG versions anymore.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-02-01 22:34:18 Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-02-01 22:13:35 Re: cannot move relocatable extension out of pg_catalog schema