From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: naming of wal-archives |
Date: | 2013-01-31 14:47:34 |
Message-ID: | 510A8406.3010204@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 01/31/2013 01:48 AM, Neil Worden wrote:
>
> Btw, ps shows:
>
>
> The archiver process says "last was 000000010000006E00000034" and when i
> look into my wal-archive-directory i see:
>
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 31 10:24
> 000000010000006E00000033
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 31 10:24
> 000000010000006E00000034
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 29 16:03
> 000000010000008C0000008E
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 29 16:32
> 000000010000008C0000008F
>
> The 6E..34 file was just written by the archiver process. But further
> down at the same time this file was written:
>
> ...
> -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 31 10:24
> 000000010000008E00000054
>
> which seems to match the position of the streaming wal-senders .
>
> Any ideas ?
Yes, I think you are going to have to map this out for us.
Something like:
pg_receivexlog to ?
/
Machine A (Master) Archiving on ----> /some_archive_dir
\
Machine B (standby)
\
Machine C (standby)
I cannot follow what is going on from the written description.
>
> Thanks, Neil.
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | deepak | 2013-01-31 15:21:58 | Re: Version numbers for binaries |
Previous Message | Leonardo M. Ramé | 2013-01-31 14:47:23 | Parsing COPY ... WITH BINARY |