Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2017-01-25 07:48:20
Message-ID: 50e00868-6483-4bca-a38e-5df1cdaa25e4@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Ashutosh,

On 2017/01/25 14:54, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> The documentation available at
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-createtable.html,
> does not make it clear that the lower bound of a range partition is
> always inclusive and the higher one is exclusive. I think a note in
> section " PARTITION OF parent_table FOR VALUES partition_bound_spec"
> would be helpful.

Yes, I'm working on a documentation patch for that and a few other things
such as revising the Partitioning chapter.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2017-01-25 08:26:27 Re: patch: function xmltable
Previous Message Vitaly Burovoy 2017-01-25 07:43:27 Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support