| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Date: | 2013-01-16 19:12:07 |
| Message-ID: | 50F6FB87.7040405@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
> Do we really need unlogged MVs in the first iteration? Seems like
> that's adding a whole bunch of new issues, when you have quite enough
> already without that.
While I think there is strong user demand for unlogged MVs, if we can
get MVs without unlogged ones for 9.3, I say go for that. We'll add
unlogged in 9.4.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-01-16 19:14:45 | pgsql: Split out XLog reading as an independent facility |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-16 18:38:57 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-01-16 19:20:52 | Re: [PATCH 3/5] Split out xlog reading into its own module called xlogreader |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-01-16 18:38:57 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |