Re: Prevent restored WAL files from being archived again Re: Unnecessary WAL archiving after failover

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prevent restored WAL files from being archived again Re: Unnecessary WAL archiving after failover
Date: 2012-12-29 21:07:51
Message-ID: 50DF5BA7.6070200@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02.10.2012 21:20, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:11 AM, Simon Riggs<simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> but its not high on my radar
>> right now unless you can explain why it should be higher.
>
> It may not be high, but I'm just worried that we are likely to forget to
> apply that change into HEAD if we postpone it furthermore.

Ping? I haven't been paying much attention to this, but please commit
the 9.2 fix to HEAD. This just caused a small merge conflict when I
tried to backport (or rather, forward-port) a patch. We do more changes
to HEAD later.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2012-12-29 21:10:10 Re: enhanced error fields
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2012-12-29 20:49:12 Re: enhanced error fields