Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?

From: "Will Rutherdale (rutherw)" <rutherw(at)cisco(dot)com>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?
Date: 2009-03-27 20:27:03
Message-ID: 50A8E1F8D9122546A7F67134915EDB7A3B8E4E@xmb-rtp-21a.amer.cisco.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I see. Perhaps earlier I alienated some people by talking about
transactions per second, which is not necessarily an appropriate unit.

Thanks for the tip.

-Will

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Marlowe [mailto:scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com]
Sent: 27 March 2009 16:08
To: Will Rutherdale (rutherw)
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Is there a meaningful benchmark?

This is one of those areas where postgresql acts very differently from
other dbs. In lots of other dbs big transactions are the performance
killer. In PostgreSQL big transactions are the way to get better
performace.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-03-27 21:11:16 Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2009-03-27 20:07:31 Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?