> Well, per our discussion here in person, I'm not convinced that this
> buys us anything in the "let's replace AMQ" case. However, as I pointed
> out in my last email, this feature doesn't need to replace AMQ to be
> useful. Let's focus on the original use case of supplying a queue which
> Londiste and Slony can use, which is a sufficient motivation to push the
> feature if the Slony and Londiste folks think it's good enough (and it
> seems that they do).
BTW, I talked to Marko Kreen about this feature at the boat party, and
he thought it would work for pgQ.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com