From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Franklin, Dan (FEN)" <Dan(dot)Franklin(at)pearson(dot)com> |
Cc: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Tons of free RAM. Can't make it go away. |
Date: | 2012-10-22 18:24:59 |
Message-ID: | 50858F7B.4040802@optionshouse.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 10/22/2012 01:20 PM, Franklin, Dan (FEN) wrote:
> http://blog.jcole.us/2010/09/28/mysql-swap-insanity-and-the-numa-archite
> cture/
Yeah, I remember reading that a while back. While interesting, it
doesn't really apply to PG, in that unlike MySQL, we don't allocate any
large memory segments directly to any large block. With MySQL, it's not
uncommon to dedicate over 50% of RAM to the MySQL process itself, but I
don't often see PG systems with more than 8GB in shared_buffers.
All the rest should be available for random allocation in general. At
least, in theory.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2012-10-22 18:28:19 | Re: Tons of free RAM. Can't make it go away. |
Previous Message | Franklin, Dan (FEN) | 2012-10-22 18:20:09 | Re: Tons of free RAM. Can't make it go away. |