From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josef Machytka <josef(dot)machytka(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL logical replication depends on WAL segments? |
Date: | 2019-01-22 14:56:18 |
Message-ID: | 507c69ad-e87b-2180-c2ec-08e1aee20352@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 1/22/19 5:18 AM, Josef Machytka wrote:
> Hello, I already tried to ask on stackoverflow but so far without success.
> (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54292816/postgresql-logical-replication-depends-on-wal-segments)
>
> Could someone help me please?
>
> ****
>
> I am successfully using logical replication between 2 PG 11 cloud VMs
> for latest data. But I tried to publish also some older tables to
> transfer data between databases and got strange error about missing WAL
> segment.
>
> These older partitions contain data 5-6 days old. I successfully
> published them on master and refreshed subscription on logical replica.
> But now I am getting these strange error messages on logical replica:
>
>
> Which is confusing for me. I tried to find some info but did not find
> anything about logical replication depending on WAL segments.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/logical-replication-architecture.html
> Thanks for help.
>
> Josef Machytka
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josef Machytka | 2019-01-22 16:01:49 | Re: PostgreSQL logical replication depends on WAL segments? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2019-01-22 14:39:57 | Re: Marc G. Fournier Invoice |