From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
Date: | 2002-01-23 19:57:14 |
Message-ID: | 5078.1011815834@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bill Studenmund <wrstuden(at)netbsd(dot)org> writes:
> One of the things schemas have to support is essentially a PATH specifier.
Yes, but...
> So all we need to do is have all of the schemas created in a new DB have
> path specifiers pulling in all of the other schemas. Thus we can make a
> schema-savy system act as if it has only one namespace.
When you create a new user, do all those path specifiers for the
existing users magically update themselves? Seems like maintenance
would be a pain.
Fernando's "any" idea is probably a cleaner way to handle it if we
wanted to do things like that. But I still think it'll be safer and
more controllable if we provide a "public" namespace instead; see
followup discussions.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2002-01-23 20:38:31 | Re: Add OR REPLACE clauses to non-FUNCTION object creation in PostgreSQL 7.3 |
Previous Message | Vsevolod Lobko | 2002-01-23 19:34:31 | Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |