Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: September 2012 commitfest

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: September 2012 commitfest
Date: 2012-10-11 18:42:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/11/2012 02:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> IIRC, the parallel pg_dump one is said to need review by a Windows
>>> expert, which is not me, so I've not looked at it.
>> Andrew?  Magnus?
> There's, unfortunately, not a chance I'll have a time to look at any
> of that until after Sorry.

I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this 
then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing? Are we more or 
less happy with the rest?



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2012-10-11 18:48:45
Subject: Re: change in LOCK behavior
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-10-11 18:41:58
Subject: Re: change in LOCK behavior

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group