Re: September 2012 commitfest

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: September 2012 commitfest
Date: 2012-10-11 18:42:54
Message-ID: 5077132E.70007@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 10/11/2012 02:22 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> IIRC, the parallel pg_dump one is said to need review by a Windows
>>> expert, which is not me, so I've not looked at it.
>> Andrew? Magnus?
> There's, unfortunately, not a chance I'll have a time to look at any
> of that until after pgconf.eu. Sorry.

I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing? Are we more or
less happy with the rest?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2012-10-11 18:48:45 Re: change in LOCK behavior
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-10-11 18:41:58 Re: change in LOCK behavior