Home
About
Download
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Donate
Your account
Quick Links
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
IRC
Local User Groups
Events
International Sites
LGPL
From:
"John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To:
<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:
LGPL
Date:
2005-06-15 01:53:09
Message-ID:
5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A9342@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views:
Raw Message
|
Whole Thread
|
Download mbox
|
Resend email
Thread:
2005-06-15 01:53:09 from "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
2005-06-15 01:59:20 from "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
2005-06-15 02:10:35 from Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
2005-06-15 02:14:42 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2005-06-17 18:55:46 from Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
2005-06-15 03:08:41 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
Is there any reason why we would not be able to use LGPL code in PG?
... John
Responses
Re: LGPL
at 2005-06-15 01:59:20 from Marc G. Fournier
Re: LGPL
at 2005-06-15 03:08:41 from Tom Lane
Browse pgsql-hackers by date
From
Date
Subject
Next Message
Marc G. Fournier
2005-06-15 01:59:20
Re: LGPL
Previous Message
Bruce Momjian
2005-06-15 01:37:50
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix NUMERIC modulus to properly truncate