Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem

From:	"John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To:	"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc:	<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
Date:	2005-05-04 03:22:04
Message-ID:	5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A92F0@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2005-05-04 03:22:04 from "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>  2005-05-04 03:38:27 from Andrew - Supernews <andrew+nonews(at)supernews(dot)com>  2005-05-04 03:54:19 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Responses

• Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem at 2005-05-04 03:38:27 from Andrew - Supernews
• Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem at 2005-05-04 03:54:19 from Tom Lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	James William Pye	2005-05-04 03:25:04	Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message	Mischa Sandberg	2005-05-04 02:52:16	Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?