| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: More robust pg_hba.conf parsing/error logging |
| Date: | 2009-09-09 19:04:25 |
| Message-ID: | 5060.1252523065@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> In general, I think that sounds like a good idea. At the same time, I
> wouldn't be against changing the specific 'ALL' special-case comparison
> in 8.4.2, using the argument that not many people have moved to it yet
> and it's pretty far out there for an 'ALL' database to exist anyway..
I don't think this is back-patch material. We've had what, one
complaint in twelve years? The odds of causing a problem seem
higher than the odds of preventing one.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-09-09 19:10:53 | Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-09-09 19:00:39 | Re: CTE bug? |