Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-09-23 20:27:31
Message-ID: 505F70B3.9040800@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 09/22/2012 01:57 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Below is the patch that I mentioned at pgOpen. I'm pretty sure my
> silly github pull request got screwed up anyway, so probably best to
> ignore it. Regardless, please let me know what you think. I'd be
> happy to rework it to operate off of a single hash, though I think
> that would require having 'one true hash' of all possible steps and
> it kind of looked like you were trying to avoid that.

I'm not sure it's a great advance, but I'll take a look. In any case
please sent it as a proper MIME attachment. It did not come through
clean. Alternatively, and probably better, put this on a topic branch
that I can git-fetch (that's recommended practice for github pull
requests too).

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafal Pietrak 2012-09-23 21:18:21 patch review for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-09-23 19:30:35 Re: trivial typo in src/tools/RELEASE_CHANGES