Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: <dan(at)coffeecode(dot)net>,<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes
Date: 2012-09-12 12:00:31
Message-ID: 5050330F020000250004A22B@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" wrote:
> Dan Scott wrote:
>>> I ran across a minor typo while reviewing the full-text search
>>> documentation. Attached is a patch to address the one usage of
>>> "lexems" in a sea of "lexemes".
>>
>> Applied to HEAD.
>>
> No back patch? Seems like a bugfix to me...

I thought that "minor" changes to the docs were not back-patched.
Did I misunderstand that or is there an exception for spelling
corrections? I'm happy to follow any policy we have, but I guess I'm
not clear enough what that is.

-Kevin

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-09-12 12:23:50 Re: Doc typo: lexems -> lexemes
Previous Message amit.kapila 2012-09-12 11:54:59 BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown