Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "DocSea - Patrice Delorme" <pdelorme(at)docsea(dot)com>, <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal
Date: 2012-09-11 14:10:30
Message-ID: 504F0006020000250004A19B@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

DocSea - Patrice Delorme <pdelorme(at)docsea(dot)com> wrote:

> It is impossible to fetch data when numeric value in database is
> NaN
> It throws FAST_NUMBER_FAILED
> (postgresql-jdbc-9.1-902:AbstractJdbc2ResultSet:2176) because my
> value is not numeric (NaN).
> This is incorect behaviour since 'NaN' is a legal value in
> postgres for numeric type.

How do you expect what you read to be represented in Java?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikko Tiihonen 2012-09-11 17:38:35 Re: Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal
Previous Message DocSea - Patrice Delorme 2012-09-11 10:37:00 Bug : FAST_NUMBER_FAILED when getting NaN on BigDecimal