This is really late, but ...
On 08/21/12 11:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Our sinval synchronization mechanism has a somewhat weird design that
> makes this OK.
... I don't want to miss the change to thank you, Robert, for the detailed
explanation. I have backported b4fbe392f8ff6ff1a66b488eb7197eef9e1770a4 to 9.1.3
and it is working well in production for ~2 weeks, but I must admit that I had
put in the unnecessary read barrier into SIGetDataEntries just to be on the safe
side. I will take it out for the next builds.
Thanks, Nils