Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning
Date: 2012-09-10 01:04:41
Message-ID: 504D3CA9.7050001@catalyst.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 09/09/12 14:01, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> The TWO most important factors in hindering us to convert to
>> Postgres are the following:
>>
>> Parallel execution of queries.
>>
>> No Table Partitioning
>
> Not a bug, so off-topic for this list. If you need help figuring
> out how best to use PostgreSQL, or whether it is a good fit for
> your use-case, a post to pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org would be more
> appropriate.
>
>

Or even -hackers - but it would make sense to ask 2 questions along the
lines of:

1/ What is the current state of table partitioning...is anyone working
on something a bit more native than abusing inheritance?

2/ Is anyone working on parallel query execution?

Regards

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2012-09-10 04:31:48 Re: BUG #7524: Partitioning
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-09 22:37:58 Re: BUG #7516: PL/Perl crash