Re: Multiple setup steps for isolation tests

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multiple setup steps for isolation tests
Date: 2012-09-04 11:23:56
Message-ID: 50459E7C0200002500049DEC@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The grammar changes look wrong: I think you eliminated the
>>> ability to have zero setup steps, no? Instead, setup_list should
>>> expand to either empty or "setup_list setup".
>
>> I tried that first, but had shift/reduce conflicts.
>
> [ scratches head ... ] Dunno what you did exactly, but the attached
> version works fine for me.

[ slaps forhead ]

Yeah, that should do it. Will apply.

Thanks.

-Kevin

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2012-09-04 11:47:49 Re: index-only scans versus serializable transactions
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2012-09-04 10:11:28 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol