| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Luzanov <p(dot)luzanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Zhang <david(dot)zhang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rmt(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |
| Date: | 2023-06-23 16:16:48 |
| Message-ID: | 50450.1687537008@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 5:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> * I agree that the "tabular" format looks nicer and has fewer i18n
>> issues than the other proposals.
> As you are on board with a separate command please clarify whether you mean
> the tabular format but still with newlines, one row per grantee, or the
> table with one row per grantor-grantee pair.
I'd lean towards a straight table with a row per grantee/grantor.
I tend to think that faking table layout with some newlines is
a poor idea. I'm not dead set on that approach though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-06-23 16:37:47 | Re: Assert while autovacuum was executing |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2023-06-23 15:52:34 | Re: psql: Add role's membership options to the \du+ command |