Re: What's new in PostgreSQL 9.2

From: Marc Cousin <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What's new in PostgreSQL 9.2
Date: 2012-08-28 12:29:35
Message-ID: 503CB9AF.2030700@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 28/08/2012 11:29, Chris Travers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Gmail <cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:cousinmarc(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've finished writing the "What's new" for 9.2. Here it is:
>
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/What%27s_new_in_PostgreSQL_9.2
>
> Please, proof-read it, English isn't my native language.
>
> As usual, I had to make choices about what to present here. If your
> favorite feature isn't here, please add it, or tell me about it :)
>
> A couple points
>
> 1) CHECK ... NO INHERIT should get its own heading. It isn't really
> a matter of a NOT VALID check constraint.
Agreed. And corrected :)

>
> 2) I don't know how these are getting ranked but the SECURITY BARRIER
> bit might do better as a major feature. It has the potential to be a
> total game changer in the way multi-tenant applications are developed
> and viewed.
>
They are ranked by how I felt they can be important for a user at the
moment of writing. So the ranking is totally arbitrary.

I agree with your point: for someone developing a multi-tenant
application and using views, it is a very important feature. For
PostgreSQL users as a whole, I don't know, and I felt it wasn't.

Anyone else having an opinion on this ?

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-08-28 14:09:51 Re: What's new in PostgreSQL 9.2
Previous Message Chris Travers 2012-08-28 09:29:11 Re: What's new in PostgreSQL 9.2