Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions
Date: 2026-09-16 15:49:28
Message-ID: 501934.1789573768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 16 Sep 2026, at 13:01, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> After the revert, the buildfarm member longfin reported the test failure [1],
>> which seems to have been caused by the revert.
>> ...
>> After the revert, pg_control_checkpoint() now returns 19 columns, but its
>> pg_proc.dat entry still declares 20 output columns, including
>> data_page_checksum_version. This seems to trigger the assertion failure
>> in heap_form_tuple().

> Ugh, I thought I had tested everything but clearly missed this one. Will fix immediately when back from lunch.

It seems quite odd to me that only a couple of BF animals are showing
this failure. Do we understand why that should be? I can poke into
it on longfin's host if that would help.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2026-09-16 15:50:59 Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2026-09-16 14:08:29 Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2026-09-16 15:50:30 Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2026-09-16 15:48:10 Re: [PG19][PATCH] Make postgres_fdw statistics import atomic