| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions |
| Date: | 2026-09-16 15:49:28 |
| Message-ID: | 501934.1789573768@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
>> On 16 Sep 2026, at 13:01, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> After the revert, the buildfarm member longfin reported the test failure [1],
>> which seems to have been caused by the revert.
>> ...
>> After the revert, pg_control_checkpoint() now returns 19 columns, but its
>> pg_proc.dat entry still declares 20 output columns, including
>> data_page_checksum_version. This seems to trigger the assertion failure
>> in heap_form_tuple().
> Ugh, I thought I had tested everything but clearly missed this one. Will fix immediately when back from lunch.
It seems quite odd to me that only a couple of BF animals are showing
this failure. Do we understand why that should be? I can poke into
it on longfin's host if that would help.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2026-09-16 15:50:59 | Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-09-16 14:08:29 | Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-09-16 15:50:30 | Re: Reject WAIT FOR earlier in transaction-snapshot mode |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2026-09-16 15:48:10 | Re: [PG19][PATCH] Make postgres_fdw statistics import atomic |