Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)

From: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, "Harold A(dot) Giménez" <harold(dot)gimenez(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
Date: 2012-07-23 13:04:46
Message-ID: 500D4BEE.7010205@ringerc.id.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On 07/23/2012 08:29 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I'm not sure how you automate testing a pull-the-plug scenario.

fire up kvm or qemu instances, then kill 'em.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-23 13:47:16 Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-23 12:56:38 Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin French 2012-07-23 13:46:28 Re: Odd blocking (or massively latent) issue - even with EXPLAIN
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-07-23 12:56:38 Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)