From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: row literal problem |
Date: | 2012-07-18 19:27:45 |
Message-ID: | 50070E31.8010006@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 07/18/2012 03:18 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> I'm chasing up an issue from a client who has this problem (in 9.1):
>>
>> with q as
>> (
>> some query here
>> )
>> select q.* from q
>>
>> yields:
>>
>> job_scope | checked_col
>> -----------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------
>> Co Revenues: Co Revenues $100 to $999 Million | <input panel=data
>> type=checkbox checked>
>> Metropolitan Area: Austin-Round Rock | <input panel=data
>> type=checkbox checked>
>>
>> which is as expected.
>>
>> However,
>>
>> with q as
>> (
>> same query here
>> )
>> select q from q
>>
>> yields:
>>
>> q
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ("Co Revenues: Co Revenues $100 to $999 Million","<input panel=data
>> type=checkbox checked>",)
>> ("Metropolitan Area: Austin-Round Rock","<input panel=data type=checkbox
>> checked>",)
>>
>>
>> Note the trailing comma inside the (), which certainly looks bogus to me. If
>> I replace "select q" with "select row(q.*)" it disappears.
>>
>> It doesn't happen in all cases, and I'm trying to work out a minimal
>> reproducible example. But it sure is puzzling.
> there are no null fields, right? if the last field is sometimes null
> you'd see that (you probably ruled that out though). when you say
> 'sometimes', do you mean for some rows and not others? or for some
> queries?
>
No, the inner query has two fields.
It happens for all rows, but not for all two-field-resulting queries as
q. I'm trying to find a simple case rather than the rather complex query
my customer is using.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-18 19:30:05 | Re: row literal problem |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2012-07-18 19:18:27 | Re: row literal problem |