Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Benjamin Leff <benjamin(dot)w(dot)leff(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Client-only Meson Build From Sources
Date: 2025-10-21 16:02:27
Message-ID: 500406.1761062547@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Benjamin Leff <benjamin(dot)w(dot)leff(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I believe the prevailing opinion was that the amount
>> of time saved by not building all of PG didn't justify the maintenance
>> effort to keep the build scripts working for that case

> IMO, it’s not just about time. For bare bones package managers when there’s
> no need to build the server, this saves a few GB.

It's still fundamentally about trading off machine resources versus
people time, though, and that tradeoff is not getting more attractive.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-10-21 16:09:01 Re: CI: Add task that runs pgindent
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-10-21 16:01:04 Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_trigger_ddl() to retrieve the CREATE TRIGGER statement